Our mission is to provide an affordable means of increasing and accelerating skills among early readers with various learning styles and ability levels.

Poor Literacy Rates: Issues and Solutions

Poor Literacy Rates: Issues and Solutions

Thirty-two percent of fourth-grade students scored in the below basic reading level of the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (U.S. Department of Education, 2019, p.91). Additionally, The Yale Center for Dyslexia and Creativity (2017) reports that 1 in 5 individuals are dyslexic. The consequences of illiteracy and low literacy are tragic. Over 75% of those who drop out of high school attribute their decision to difficulties in reading (Lyon, 2003). These individuals are twice as likely to live in poverty and 63 times more likely to be incarcerated (Breslow, 2012).

To find long term solutions that prevent staggering numbers of individuals from struggling to read, particular consideration must be given to two main issues. One is thatmany school districts are exceptionally hard pressed to meet the demands of funding special education (“Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Cost Impact,” 2015). After decades of federal, state, and local budgetary constraints, the need for high quality, lower cost solutions is clear (Petrilli, 2012).

The second major issue in addressing poor literacy rates is that schools must select proven interventions and provide them earlier (Hamilton & Glascoe, 2006: 2083; Lyon, 1996; Sanfilippo et al., 2019). In their meta study analysis, The National Reading Panel (U.S. Department of Education, 2005) definitively concluded that the provision of explicit training in phonemic awareness and phonics substantially increases reading achievement. They suggested that this should be one of the key considerations in the teaching of reading for early readers in general. To address problems experienced by most disadvantaged readers, Hamilton and Glascoe (2006: 2083) are among numerous experts who further specify that programs must “use detailed and intensive approaches emphasizing” these skill areas (2006: 2083). Other evidence also points to the need for multisensory and mnemonic approaches to maximize effectiveness and ensure inclusivity (International Dyslexia Association, 2017, pp. 8-9). Unfortunately, many early literacy programs do not incorporate adequate levels of the kind of explicit phonetic and inclusive instruction that is recommended (Denton, Fletcher, Taylor, Barth, & Vaughn, 2014; Kilpatrick, 2015; Sanfilippo et al., 2019). This is surprising, as early interventions prescribed by researchers can prevent minor disabilities from becoming major ones that are far more difficult to remediate and that reduce the likelihood of success (Lyon, 1996; Allington, 2011, pp.40-5). It is also important to emphasize that explicit instruction in phonological awareness and phonics has universal value and is advantageous to most

ALL beginning readers.

References

Allington, R. L. (2011, March). What at-risk readers need. Educational Leadership: What Students Need to Learn, 68(6), 40-45. Retrieved from

http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/mar11/vol68/num06/What_At-Risk_Readers_Need.aspx

Breslow, J.M. (2012, September). By the numbers: dropping out of high school.

Frontiline. Retrieved from

Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Taylor, W.P., Barth, A.E., & Vaughn, S. (2014). An experimental evaluation of guided reading and explicit interventions for primary-grade students at-risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7:3, 268-293. Doi: 10.1080/19345747.2014.906010

Hamilton, M. D., & Glascoe, F. P. (2006, December 15). Evaluation of children with

 reading difficulties. American Family Physician, 74, 2079-2084. Retrieved from

https://www.aafp.org/afp/2006/1215/p2079.html

Individuals with disabilities education act- cost impact on local school districts. (2015,

June 3). Federal Education Budget Project. Retrieved from http://atlas.newamerica.org/individuals-disabilities-education-act-cost-impact-local-school-districts

International Dyslexia Association. (2017). Dyslexia in the classroom: What every

teacher needs to know. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/DITC-Handbook.pdf

Kilpatrick, D. A. (2015). Essentials of Assessing, Preventing, and Overcoming Reading Difficulties. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

Lyon, G. R. (1996, Spring). Learning disabilities. Future Child 6(1), 54-76. Retrieved

from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8689262.

Lyon, G. R. (2003). Measuring success: Using assessments and accountability to raise

student achievement [Web log post].  Retrieved from the Center for Learning and

Development: https://www.cdl.org/articles/measuring-success-using-assessments-and-accountability-to-riase-student-achievement/

Petrilli, M.J. (2012, April 20). Stretching the school-district dollar. Retrieved

from http://educationnext.org/stretching-the-school-district-dollar/

Sanfilippo, J., Ness, M., Petscher, Y., Rappaport, L., Zuckerman, B., & Gaab, N. (2019,

September). Reintroducing dyslexia: Early identification and implications for pediatric practice. OSF Preprints. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/z4ryh

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). The condition of education (NCES Publication No. 2019-144). Retrieved from

https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019144.pdf

U.S. Department of Education, National Reading Panel. (2005). The national reading panel report: Practical advice for teachers. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489535.pdf

The Yale Center for Dyslexia and Creativity. (2017). Frequently-asked questions.

Retrieved from http://dyslexia.yale.edu/dyslexia/dyslexia-faq/

Skip to content